NOTE: This blog now hosts more than 750 blogs. Quite often I dig around the “archives” for a post that is particularly appropriate. This article, published on August 10, 2015, on the state of the church, seems appropriate for 2018 when the world seems to have gone mad – and some Christians are supporting the madness. I was reminded of this blog when a friend recommended a book by Josh Packard, Ph.D (who is quoted in the blog below) and Ashleigh Hope, also published in paper back in 2015: Church Refugees: Sociologists reveal why people are DONE with church but not their faith). I highly recommend another very personal account of questioning the church by a well-known pastor, Kent Dobson, Bitten by a Camel, Leaving Church Finding God.
Though they were committed to the church for decades often as leaders, The Dones no longer or rarely attend. Though they often worked for years to reform the church from within, they are now fed up with organized religion. Some are dissatisfied with the structure or the politics of the institutional church. Some question the social message the Church represents. Some yearn for a call to deeper commitment to spiritual formation, a challenge to drink from a deeper spiritual well. Whatever their reason, Packard says, these “spiritual refugees present a challenge to the church.”
I am one of The Dones – or at least of the Almost Dones. More than ever I understand the power of the gospel spoken by Jesus, re-told by the disciples, or put in words as scripture – but not always reflected in the church. People in Jesus’ times were obeying dry, stale, and often incorrect theology. Made powerless by Roman rulers and their Jewish sycophants, they were becoming slaves to the literalism of their religious leaders. The heart and passion of a Moses or a David or a Jeremiah or a Micah were hard to find. That’s why Jesus seemed radical. We need that radical Jesus in our own age!
The Dones that I know (and many I don’t know who read this blog) are looking for passion and fire and authenticity in their church. Some are actively contemplative (and I do see the traditional oxymoron in that phrase). Some recognize the Power of the Holy Spirit in the life of the early disciples and the church they created and wonder why that Power seems shackled in their church. Some read about the disciples grappling with issues of inclusivity and coming down on the side of love, and they long for the same welcoming spirit in their congregations. Some wrestle with Jesus’ words in the Sermon on the Mount, but see an attitude of “what’s mine is mine” permeating their church. Basically The Dones see a Church which was originally inspired by the spirit, example, and love of Jesus but is now satisfied with the status quo.
Packard concludes his article with this challenge to the Church: “Will churches be vibrant, indispensable guides to helping people find meaningful life and making a difference in the world? Or will they continue to alienate some of their most passionate members?”
The answer to those questions are what The Dones and Almost Dones are hoping to see resolved soon. If the answers are “no,” I suspect we will continue to see new and creative ways to be the body of Christ in the future.
I totally agree. However, we need to be willing to look at the flaws of any institution – particularly the Church. Jesus certainly didn’t flinch at calling out the religious establishment of his day. We can’t fix what we don’t recognize as needing fixing. I believe that when the church gets in the way of or doesn’t promote a vital “in-going” spiritual and a Jesus-centered “out-going,” It needs re-thinking. Thanks for your comment!
Paul tells us never to stop meeting together. Meeting to gather can change. Sometimes the Church strays further than others but even Martin Luther and Dallas Willard seeing wrong did not choose to be Dones. They worked for going back to where God’s wants his Church.